Get a few good photo ops of him in military gear with a cool chopper behind him, trying to look human as he shoves toothpicks in his cheeks to shape a smile at a little Native kid.
Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Duncan, who announced the measures in question period Wednesday, told the House of Commons that "urgent health and safety issues" in the northern Ontario community needed immediate action. "The Government of Canada has informed the chief that we are placing the community in third-party management to ensure community needs are addressed," Duncan said. "Part of the manager's role will be to administer my department's funding which is normally managed by the First Nation directly."
Harper doesn’t bother to wait for the report he said he’s having done on how money has been spent. Hell no. These are natives. It’s pretty obvious to him they can’t manage their own affairs and the problems with underfunding spending must be due to their mismanagement. That’s why we needed those residential schools he was forced to inspired to apologize for.
And now he’s supposed to build them new schools? Look what happened last time. Ingrates!
Third party management. Guilty without an investigation. Must be their faullt ‘cause it sure as hell can’t be his, right? Forget that the AG said the quality of life on reservations is appalling and care is poorly managed by INAC.
Bad premise on which to begin rectifying the situation at Attawapiskat and other locations. This has simply become another excuse harper will use to cut funding (!!!) And take away what little autonomy First Nations still have.
Duncan and harper’s response to this crisis has been unconscionable. It will not change. It is how the CONs perceive anyone who isn’t them, and First Nations are below the bottom of his scale of who matters, who deserves basic human rights.
Showing posts with label first nations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label first nations. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Thursday, October 27, 2011
A new stained glass window on the Hill
Cynic that I am, I thought maybe this:
Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Duncan announced Thursday the legacy of Canada's Indian residential schools program will be permanently etched on Parliament Hill in stained glass...Duncan said he's consulted with aboriginal leaders about the window as an "important gesture of reconciliation" and "they get it."
Now if the government actually does something to deal with the current problems First Nations still face, I'll be really impressed.
But no, it's something else that's to be enshrined in stained glass on a Parliament window, and proof that 900 doesn't hate everything, I like this plan.
Now if the government actually does something to deal with the current problems First Nations still face, I'll be really impressed.
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Shame
Really?...
Really?...
When we carry sacred items, we carry them with the recognition that everything in Creation has spirit, including the animals and plants, the rocks, the water, moonand the stars. Even one feather of a bird has spirit. When we carry a feather in our bundle and use it for our personal prayers and in ceremony, we are calling on the spirit of that bird for help and guidance...The eagle is one of the ones who are closest to the Creator because he can fly so high and he spoke for the people...You earn an eagle feather and you have to live by it.
This is wrong. Very, very wrong. Worse than giving Conrad Black the Order of Canada. It makes a mockery of a great honour.
This guy recognizes the value of all of nature? This guy speaks for the people?
Brothers and sisters, wake up.
Really?...
When we carry sacred items, we carry them with the recognition that everything in Creation has spirit, including the animals and plants, the rocks, the water, moonand the stars. Even one feather of a bird has spirit. When we carry a feather in our bundle and use it for our personal prayers and in ceremony, we are calling on the spirit of that bird for help and guidance...The eagle is one of the ones who are closest to the Creator because he can fly so high and he spoke for the people...You earn an eagle feather and you have to live by it.
This guy recognizes the value of all of nature? This guy speaks for the people?
Brothers and sisters, wake up.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Another worse-than-useless Harper appointee
Stalling hearings, abusing staff, keeping serious caes on hold...
No, it's not Ouimet, it's not Rights and Democracy, and it's not Elliott. This is yet another person appointed by harper to pretend something is being done, but whose real job is to collect a substantial pay check while doing nothing on a serious case(except abuse staff) for TWO YEARS.
The embattled Canadian Human Rights Tribunal was publicly rebuked Monday for a two-year delay in dealing with a case involving the welfare of First Nations children.
oh...that explains some of it. First Nations case.
"It's not simply about money or financial damages," said lawyer Paul Champ, "it's about vulnerable children who are being denied the equal right to stay in their homes and communities. It's no exaggeration to say that more children are harmed every month that passes without this complaint being resolved." Champ said planned hearings at the tribunal were cancelled for no apparent reason. Langtry agreed with Champ that the delays are harming children.
Wait long enough, those kids will be all grown up, problem solved, right? If any of them suffer as a result, some future government can issue an apology, maybe erect a nice plaque, do a token native dance at some summit or international event we host, saying how we value the rich heritage of “our” First Nations.
So what’s been keeping the Tribunal so busy?
According to the Public Service Alliance, five employees -roughly a quarter of the staff -have filed harassment-related complaints against tribunal chair Shirish Chotalia, the Calgary lawyer appointed in 2009 by the Harper government. More than half of the staff have left for other public service jobs or been sidelined by stress since she took over.
Harper sure can pick ‘em. And Canadians keep voting him back in.
No, it's not Ouimet, it's not Rights and Democracy, and it's not Elliott. This is yet another person appointed by harper to pretend something is being done, but whose real job is to collect a substantial pay check while doing nothing on a serious case(except abuse staff) for TWO YEARS.
The embattled Canadian Human Rights Tribunal was publicly rebuked Monday for a two-year delay in dealing with a case involving the welfare of First Nations children.
oh...that explains some of it. First Nations case.
"It's not simply about money or financial damages," said lawyer Paul Champ, "it's about vulnerable children who are being denied the equal right to stay in their homes and communities. It's no exaggeration to say that more children are harmed every month that passes without this complaint being resolved." Champ said planned hearings at the tribunal were cancelled for no apparent reason. Langtry agreed with Champ that the delays are harming children.
Wait long enough, those kids will be all grown up, problem solved, right? If any of them suffer as a result, some future government can issue an apology, maybe erect a nice plaque, do a token native dance at some summit or international event we host, saying how we value the rich heritage of “our” First Nations.
So what’s been keeping the Tribunal so busy?
According to the Public Service Alliance, five employees -roughly a quarter of the staff -have filed harassment-related complaints against tribunal chair Shirish Chotalia, the Calgary lawyer appointed in 2009 by the Harper government. More than half of the staff have left for other public service jobs or been sidelined by stress since she took over.
Harper sure can pick ‘em. And Canadians keep voting him back in.
Labels:
chotalia,
first nations,
harper,
human rights tribunal
Saturday, February 26, 2011
How about getting tough on these crimes?
Remember the video of a woman tossing unwanted puppies into a river? People all over the world were outraged. You just don’t do that to puppies, people said. They are living creatures.
Have you read last week’s high profile article on how bones found near Vimy Ridge in 2003 were identified last month by a research team in Thunder Bay, ON, and now Pte. Thomas Lawless of Calgary, killed at the Ridge in 1917 can receive a proper burial, with honours? Relatives who never met him have been notified by Veterans Affairs and they will attend the service.
Did you read an article published February 17, 2011 about what are likely hundreds of children’s bodies lying unidentified in unmarked graves? You may not have seen it. It appeared in section H of the Winnipeg Free Press.
It is not a new story but it never seems to catch the attention that you would think the mass murder of children would.
You would also think that if researchers in Thunder Bay could use genetic testing to identify a man who died at Vimy Ridge in 1917, they could identify many of these bodies of children who still have living relatives who knew them. You think they would make it a priority.
But it seems that aboriginal children are like those unwanted dogs drowned in a river. Just a nuisance. Worse, even, because being human on paper at least, the deaths have to be covered up, hidden. And our oh so enlightened society has to relegate the knowledge of such murders and unmarked graves of children to the barest, faintest reaches of our peripheral thoughts. Things of nightmare, to be sure. Don’t look, don’t talk about it, and for god’s sake (and here I use the name of that mythical deity intentionally), don’t stir up the dirt that hides the horrors.
No one knows how many children died in residential schools. No one knows how many graves were dug for them.
Chilling. Horrible. So where are the cries of outrage? The demand for justice? The kindly, compassionate folk who understand that living relatives of these murdered children deserve to know what happened and should have the chance to bury their dead?
Research at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is underway to get a grip on the approximate number of missing children and unmarked graves at residential schools in Canada, including on the Prairies.
There is no doubt that many of these children died from neglect, and little doubt that more than a few were murdered. In any event, when dealing with so many bodies lying in unmarked graves, and knowing that many of those responsible for the deaths are walking free right now, these deaths should be investigated as any other deaths would, not handled as an historical dig managed by a Commission that so far has had little support and no authority to enforce.
But hey, it’s not like they’re white kids, right?
"We are, quite frankly, not going to be able to say how many children died in the schools or say where they are all buried, and what happened to them after they died," Sinclair said recently at the commission's downtown Winnipeg offices. Nevertheless, he said it's essential to tackle the issue as part of the residential schools legacy.
Part of the legacy? How about tackling it for what it is - brutal crimes of neglect, rape, and murder of numerous children taken by force from their families?
While residential school deaths may have been reported, there are few death certificates attached to student files in old archives. Finding out what happened to each child would involve matching church and government records to Vital Statistics files.
This tells us a lot about how governments and churches of those decades considered aboriginals to be less entitled to rights than non-natives. That those same churches and governments are treating this matter as a historical event that may eventually require some sort of resolution tells us that little has changed.
The commission hopes to have enough information to suggest further research and ways to commemorate the graves.
A nice plaque or two providing a lovely photo op for some bastard politician to appear somewhat human.
"We've heard stories from survivors that babies were born in the schools to mothers who'd been impregnated by teachers and by priests. They say their babies were taken away. They think their babies were killed," Sinclair said. "We don't know the extent to which that occurred, if at all."
OK. Stop. Enough with the euphemisms. Impregnated? No, these were children. That makes it rape, every damn time.
Teachers and priests. Well, wingnuts, at least they didn’t let the children have abortions, right? They rape the kids, take away the living, crying baby that resulted from their rape crime, and...murder it.
Teachers and priests. God-fearin’ folk to want to take the savage out of The Savage. Drive out the heathen beliefs and insert the holy ghost. You know, civilize them, teach them the good ways of the white, enlightened society, and have them embrace that loving god while following the teachings of christianity.
I realize that atheists also commit child rape and murder, but they are held accountable for their crimes, and they don’t have an entire sheltered religion enabling further crimes and covering up past ones for them.
In a YouTube broadcast posted this month, Favel, now an elderly woman, describes her hard life as a child in residential school. She recalls the day she saw school staff carry a newborn baby wrapped in pink through the kitchen and into the adjacent furnace room.
..."They took that baby into the... furnace room and burned it alive. You could smell the flesh cooking," Favel says, her voice soft but clear.
Gotta protect those priests. Have to protect the name of their god. Can’t have people thinking badly of them because, you know, religion does a lot of good, right? Like bring enlightenment and christianity to aboriginals?
In 1944, a priest levelled the rest of the cemetery, removing all traces of it, according to an elder interviewed by the working group who had attended the school as a child in the 1940s.
That’s the christian way, isn’t it? Just remove all traces of past crimes, move on, and preach to others on morality.
Crimes were committed. That doesn’t suggest we should reconcile a damn thing. It demands we investigate aggressively and hold those responsible for the rapes, deaths, murders, and cover-ups accountable in courts of law.
And all efforts should be made to identify every single child’s remains, determine how that child died, notify families, and provide support for a proper burial which family can attend. Just like was done for Pte. Thomas Lawless of Calgary.
Have you read last week’s high profile article on how bones found near Vimy Ridge in 2003 were identified last month by a research team in Thunder Bay, ON, and now Pte. Thomas Lawless of Calgary, killed at the Ridge in 1917 can receive a proper burial, with honours? Relatives who never met him have been notified by Veterans Affairs and they will attend the service.
Did you read an article published February 17, 2011 about what are likely hundreds of children’s bodies lying unidentified in unmarked graves? You may not have seen it. It appeared in section H of the Winnipeg Free Press.
It is not a new story but it never seems to catch the attention that you would think the mass murder of children would.
You would also think that if researchers in Thunder Bay could use genetic testing to identify a man who died at Vimy Ridge in 1917, they could identify many of these bodies of children who still have living relatives who knew them. You think they would make it a priority.
But it seems that aboriginal children are like those unwanted dogs drowned in a river. Just a nuisance. Worse, even, because being human on paper at least, the deaths have to be covered up, hidden. And our oh so enlightened society has to relegate the knowledge of such murders and unmarked graves of children to the barest, faintest reaches of our peripheral thoughts. Things of nightmare, to be sure. Don’t look, don’t talk about it, and for god’s sake (and here I use the name of that mythical deity intentionally), don’t stir up the dirt that hides the horrors.
No one knows how many children died in residential schools. No one knows how many graves were dug for them.
Chilling. Horrible. So where are the cries of outrage? The demand for justice? The kindly, compassionate folk who understand that living relatives of these murdered children deserve to know what happened and should have the chance to bury their dead?
Research at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is underway to get a grip on the approximate number of missing children and unmarked graves at residential schools in Canada, including on the Prairies.
There is no doubt that many of these children died from neglect, and little doubt that more than a few were murdered. In any event, when dealing with so many bodies lying in unmarked graves, and knowing that many of those responsible for the deaths are walking free right now, these deaths should be investigated as any other deaths would, not handled as an historical dig managed by a Commission that so far has had little support and no authority to enforce.
But hey, it’s not like they’re white kids, right?
"We are, quite frankly, not going to be able to say how many children died in the schools or say where they are all buried, and what happened to them after they died," Sinclair said recently at the commission's downtown Winnipeg offices. Nevertheless, he said it's essential to tackle the issue as part of the residential schools legacy.
Part of the legacy? How about tackling it for what it is - brutal crimes of neglect, rape, and murder of numerous children taken by force from their families?
While residential school deaths may have been reported, there are few death certificates attached to student files in old archives. Finding out what happened to each child would involve matching church and government records to Vital Statistics files.
This tells us a lot about how governments and churches of those decades considered aboriginals to be less entitled to rights than non-natives. That those same churches and governments are treating this matter as a historical event that may eventually require some sort of resolution tells us that little has changed.
The commission hopes to have enough information to suggest further research and ways to commemorate the graves.
A nice plaque or two providing a lovely photo op for some bastard politician to appear somewhat human.
"We've heard stories from survivors that babies were born in the schools to mothers who'd been impregnated by teachers and by priests. They say their babies were taken away. They think their babies were killed," Sinclair said. "We don't know the extent to which that occurred, if at all."
OK. Stop. Enough with the euphemisms. Impregnated? No, these were children. That makes it rape, every damn time.
Teachers and priests. Well, wingnuts, at least they didn’t let the children have abortions, right? They rape the kids, take away the living, crying baby that resulted from their rape crime, and...murder it.
Teachers and priests. God-fearin’ folk to want to take the savage out of The Savage. Drive out the heathen beliefs and insert the holy ghost. You know, civilize them, teach them the good ways of the white, enlightened society, and have them embrace that loving god while following the teachings of christianity.
I realize that atheists also commit child rape and murder, but they are held accountable for their crimes, and they don’t have an entire sheltered religion enabling further crimes and covering up past ones for them.
In a YouTube broadcast posted this month, Favel, now an elderly woman, describes her hard life as a child in residential school. She recalls the day she saw school staff carry a newborn baby wrapped in pink through the kitchen and into the adjacent furnace room.
..."They took that baby into the... furnace room and burned it alive. You could smell the flesh cooking," Favel says, her voice soft but clear.
Gotta protect those priests. Have to protect the name of their god. Can’t have people thinking badly of them because, you know, religion does a lot of good, right? Like bring enlightenment and christianity to aboriginals?
In 1944, a priest levelled the rest of the cemetery, removing all traces of it, according to an elder interviewed by the working group who had attended the school as a child in the 1940s.
That’s the christian way, isn’t it? Just remove all traces of past crimes, move on, and preach to others on morality.
Crimes were committed. That doesn’t suggest we should reconcile a damn thing. It demands we investigate aggressively and hold those responsible for the rapes, deaths, murders, and cover-ups accountable in courts of law.
And all efforts should be made to identify every single child’s remains, determine how that child died, notify families, and provide support for a proper burial which family can attend. Just like was done for Pte. Thomas Lawless of Calgary.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



