As U.S. Democrat Rep. Gabrielle Giffords lies in critical condition with a gun shot wound - delivered at close range - to her head, and six others, including a 9 year old girl are dead, we can hardly claim to be surprised that such a horror occurred.
(Pima County Sheriff Clarence) Dupnik did not state a motive for the assassination attempt against the Democratic congresswoman. But he suggested that "vitriolic rhetoric" in political debates could have deadly consequences.
"When you look at unbalanced people, how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths about tearing down the government, the anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on in this county is getting to be outrageous."
Vitriolic rhetoric does stir up the crazies, even more so when it is given sanction by political figures.
Readers may remember this little bit of American conservative eliminationism, from Sarah Palin’s PAC site. She invited Americans to “take aim” at twenty members of Congress who had supported Barack Obama’s health care legislation.
Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords was one of three incumbents targeted in Arizona.
Dr. Dawg refers to this, and accompanying text -
image thanks to Orwell’s Bastard
When high profile political figures use words like “take aim,” graphics showing someone in the cross hairs of a rifle, or blithely recommend the assassination of people who are inconvenient (we all remember Flanagan’s statement that Assange should be assassinated), then such rhetoric gives murder for politics and ideology a certain legitimacy in the minds of some.
They aren’t murderers, they are freedom fighters! They are defenders of democracy! They are protecting their country from those who would destroy it! They are, taking a stand! They will go down in history as heroes!
In their own sick minds, that is.
Gun imagery used in politics - targeting a political opponent in the cross hairs, for example, makes for a more dangerous environment especially when there is such a push for the right for everyone, regardless of mental state of mind, to carry a fire arm in a country where guns are just the coolest thing evah and so linked to what it is to be a true, red blooded male.
(Jared Lee Loughner’s) rambling videos had already caused him trouble at school, scaring his community college into suspending him in September. In early October, he agreed to withdraw from school. By November, Loughner had bought a Glock, purchased legally from a Sportsman's Warehouse in Tucson, the Associated Press and Washington Post reported.
A nutcase suspended for scaring his college manages to legally acquire a semi-automatic weapon a month later and uses it to kill nine people when he shows up armed at a function where issues have already incited violence.
Giffords, 40, is a moderate Democrat who narrowly won re-election in November against a tea party candidate who sought to throw her from office over her support of the health care law. Anger over her position became violent at times, with her Tucson office vandalized after the House passed the overhaul last March and someone showing up at a recent gathering with a weapon.
You politicians want to reduce crime? Curb your own vitriolic rhetoric and toughen up gun laws.
I hardly think giving Loughner - if he is found guilty - a very tough sentence will deter other crazies who think they are on some kind of heroic mission to enlighten us all to their madness.
Showing posts with label gun control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gun control. Show all posts
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Sunday, December 5, 2010
The flawed and disorder CON tough on crime road
Must be really difficult being a CON. As most people in Canada left of harper engage in personal struggles and moral debates on trying to do the greatest good and the least harm, those poor CONs, while devoid of such hampering traits as empathy engage in struggles of their own.
How do you please your rabid base when two rabid base issues conflict?
The Harper government has once again delayed implementation of regulations that police say they need to quickly trace guns used in crimes...This is the third time the Harper government has delayed the regulations, which were created by the Liberal government in 2004 and were supposed to go into effect in April of 2006.
How do you please your rabid base when two rabid base issues conflict?
The Harper government has once again delayed implementation of regulations that police say they need to quickly trace guns used in crimes...This is the third time the Harper government has delayed the regulations, which were created by the Liberal government in 2004 and were supposed to go into effect in April of 2006.
The regulations are supposed to bring Canada into compliance with international protocols requiring import marks on all firearms. The objective is to shorten the time it takes to trace guns that cross national borders as part of normal commercial transactions.
And that's good for cops, good for public safety, and those appeal greatly to the rabid base, right?
Except -
The Canadian Shooting Sports Association sent out an alert last week noting that it has been "working tirelessly" to delay both sets of regulations. "They are both now delayed until December of 2012 which gives us more time to resolve the negative impacts these regulations will have and, since there is the strong possibility of an election within the next 12 months, have them rescinded with a majority government."
If there's one thing the rabid base loves more than cops and empty talk about public safety, it's the right to carry weapons that can kill people without restriction and without cops having a damn thing to say about it.
Labels:
gun control,
ottawa cops,
police brutality,
public safety
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

