Poilievre does the chicken dance...again

The Minister of Harper’s chamber pot was once more sent to respond to questions from David McGuinty’s questions about CPC connections to Coulter. (Emphasis mine)

"The member has raised a very important question about an American commentator who has come to this country with some outrageous comments, comments supporting the Iraq war, comments supporting the use of torture and comments referring to Israel as a war criminal, but enough about the leader of the Liberal Party," Poilievre said.

Odd the feces carrier would criticize Ignatieff for supporting the Iraq war.

In an interview with the American TV network, Harper said he endorsed the (Iraq) war and said he was speaking "for the silent majority" of Canadians. Only in Quebec, with its "pacifist tradition," are most people opposed to the war, Harper said.

Guess Pierre should slap Stevie upside the head.

Or maybe he should just shut up and find another career.  I’m thinking gathering and spreading manure.

Pirate Fish says: Poilievre shivers me timbers!

And is completely chicken shit, as mentioned before.

After trying so hard to evade questions about Coulter, (because he secretly masturbates about her during debates - That was a joke. You know how I know it was a joke? I know Poilievre has no dick)

Poilievre, Parliamentary Secretary of Stephen Harper’s chamber pot was assigned to handle yet more right-wing feces yesterday during Oral Questions.

As usual, he ran around the question like a chicken with its head cut off and thought he scored some really smart Coulter-like points with his completely disconnected responses.

Hansard, March 25, 2010 (emphasis mine)

Mr. David McGuinty: ...Given (Coulter’s) views are completely out of step with mainstream Canadian values, will the Prime Minister stand here today and, without equivocation, publicly denounce her views while explaining to Canadians the link between his party and Ann Coulter?

(Enter Pierre, swilling the chamber pot)

Poilievre: ...apparently the member is obsessed about importing the views of an American political commentator. That makes sense given that he imported his leader from the same country. If he actually wants to engage in a broader debate about American politics, he has a leader who would be well qualified to do that. Speaking of views that are out of touch with mainstream Canadians, that member authored the Liberal carbon tax, which was rejected as a radical job-killing initiative by Canadians.

Now there’s a stretch, toilet man.  A question about denouncing racist views leads to a response about carbon tax proposed by a previous Liberal leader.

Being polite, McGuinty gives the chamber pot boy another chance to answer, and tries to help by providing actual facts that show why some could conclude that the CONs actually support Ms. Turkey Neck:

Mr. David McGuinty: ...Ezra Levant, who stepped aside for the Prime Minister and ran his last campaign's war room, sponsored her national tour.  The University of Ottawa Conservative club organized Tuesday's speech.  A former PMO and current Conservative assistant planned her reception at the Rideau Club.  Rainer Knopff, co-author of the Prime Minister's firewall letter and a repeat and generous Conservative donor, is organizing tonight's speech in Calgary.

It is simple. Either the Prime Minister endorses her views or he does not. Which is it?

Good questions.  Certainly shows some connected ideology.

And there goes the headless chicken...

Poilievre: ...the member raises a whole group of vitriolic accusations against a government whose fiscal plan many of his members rose to support just the other day. I wonder if he will berate them with the same vitriol as he blames himself for authoring an out-of-touch, radical, job-killing carbon tax, which led to his party's humiliating defeat in the last election.

Pirate Fish says: Poilievre is a cowardly, hypocritical, ineffectual little cur.

You know you’re deathly toxic if even Poilievre dodges the very mention of your name.

Some Conservative MPs refused to respond to questions about Coulter's views Tuesday. Heritage Minister James Moore and Nepean MP Pierre Poilievre breezed past reporters asking about Coulter.

However, little Pierre had no problem slinking around and nipping at the heels of a highly decorated, retired general (now Senator) or dodging in and out yapping and snapping at the ankles of a Canadian actor/activist. 

Maybe Coulter is just too man for Pierre.

Pirate Fish says Poilievre is awesomely doltish

Elections Canada “is using tax payers dollars to lose awesomely in two different court cases...” says little Pierre.  He was, of course, referring to Elections Canada’s investigation into the in-and-out cheating scam the Cons ran during an election.

The pudden-head Poilievre abused the Procedure and House Affairs Committee - doing what Steve pays him to do: attack like a rabid weasel - as Chief Electoral Officer Marc Mayrand appeared to discuss Elections Canada's 2009 supplementary estimates,

And as with a rabid weasel attack, it was ludicrous, disproportionate, and unwarranted.  Elections Canada must not be threatened by budget cuts when such threats are so blatantly linked to a party seeking to shut it up or discredit it for their own partisan, ass-saving purposes.  It was doing what it was mandated to do: protect our democracy by investigating a bunch of cheaters and liars who would do anything to win despite what the electorate wants.

If spending money on a losing case is the criteria for whether or not funds should be available, maybe the Pompous Little Prick can explain why it is just perfectly fine to have spent 1.3 million dollars to date on fighting a legal battle to deny democratic rights to a Canadian.

Awesomely obvious Pierre is a fool.

Mandatory Poilievre

Pirate Fish says:

Pierre Poilievre is clueless.


But Pierre Poilievre, Harper's parliamentary secretary, said a recent poll suggests Canadians are indifferent to the prime minister's decision to prorogue Parliament.



I'm a Canadian, and I'm not indifferent.  Neither are the 60,300+ (and climbing) members of Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament.

And they signed up over a few days. 

We aren't all indifferent, Pierre, you pompous little shit, and we are busy educating other Canadians on your vile, undemocratic tactics and how those are undermining all of our rights.

While it may please Pierre and his master to keep Canadians as ignorant as possible, a healthy democracy depends on an informed and educated population which engages in shaping policies.

Pierre is overall offensive, but this statement more so since it seems to suggest that if Canadians aren't aware of how the actions of a government affects them, then who gives a damn?

National Post columnist John Ivison (said), "This (facebook group) is not a groundswell of public opinion."

Not yet, Ivison.  But that's how groundswells start.  A small rise that is fed, and grows and grows and grows.  Nor does that one facebook account stand alone in its protest.  And as these groundswells grow, more people will pay attention.  Kind of hard to ignore them if you're tripping over them constantly. 

Pirate Fish says:  We are on a mission.