I realize that dumping a candidate this late during an election is something any leader would want to avoid, and I commend Ignatieff for having cut Andre Forbes over his racist comments, although a more rigid background check would have prevented his candidacy in the first place. His words weren't a mistake. They reflect his attitude and beliefs, an attitude and beliefs the Liberal party claims it condemns.
John Reilly, Liberal candidate for Wildrose also said some things that the Liberal party claims it condemns, but this time, Ignatieff forgives him and leaves him in place. The man regrets it, Ignatieff tells us, and even tries to appeal to our sense of pity by saying that the former judge will have to live with the comments the rest of his life.
Oh? And the consequences? He still gets to run in the election. I guess living with it won't be so bad after all.
Like Forbes' words, Reilly's reflect an attitude and beliefs. In fact, even after apologizing, he said he made a political error but still believes not all sex offenders should be incarcerated. He claims he used a clumsy example first time around. OK, so what sexual offense crimes deserve a walk?
It doesn't matter if Reilly had a "long and distinguished career." It doesn't matter if he made many good choices. This one stance is not one a progressive party should give a pass on. Sexual assault cannot be deemed anything else simply because the guy was young, or stupid, or helplessly turned on because the unconscious woman was naked. That just gives would be rapists permission to abuse situations.
Communicating with Trump Fans
1 week ago
