After trying so hard to evade questions about Coulter, (because he secretly masturbates about her during debates - That was a joke. You know how I know it was a joke? I know Poilievre has no dick)
Poilievre, Parliamentary Secretary of Stephen Harper’s chamber pot was assigned to handle yet more right-wing feces yesterday during Oral Questions.
As usual, he ran around the question like a chicken with its head cut off and thought he scored some really smart Coulter-like points with his completely disconnected responses.
Hansard, March 25, 2010 (emphasis mine)
Mr. David McGuinty: ...Given (Coulter’s) views are completely out of step with mainstream Canadian values, will the Prime Minister stand here today and, without equivocation, publicly denounce her views while explaining to Canadians the link between his party and Ann Coulter?
(Enter Pierre, swilling the chamber pot)
Poilievre: ...apparently the member is obsessed about importing the views of an American political commentator. That makes sense given that he imported his leader from the same country. If he actually wants to engage in a broader debate about American politics, he has a leader who would be well qualified to do that. Speaking of views that are out of touch with mainstream Canadians, that member authored the Liberal carbon tax, which was rejected as a radical job-killing initiative by Canadians.
Now there’s a stretch, toilet man. A question about denouncing racist views leads to a response about carbon tax proposed by a previous Liberal leader.
Being polite, McGuinty gives the chamber pot boy another chance to answer, and tries to help by providing actual facts that show why some could conclude that the CONs actually support Ms. Turkey Neck:
Mr. David McGuinty: ...Ezra Levant, who stepped aside for the Prime Minister and ran his last campaign's war room, sponsored her national tour. The University of Ottawa Conservative club organized Tuesday's speech. A former PMO and current Conservative assistant planned her reception at the Rideau Club. Rainer Knopff, co-author of the Prime Minister's firewall letter and a repeat and generous Conservative donor, is organizing tonight's speech in Calgary.
It is simple. Either the Prime Minister endorses her views or he does not. Which is it?
Good questions. Certainly shows some connected ideology.
And there goes the headless chicken...
Poilievre: ...the member raises a whole group of vitriolic accusations against a government whose fiscal plan many of his members rose to support just the other day. I wonder if he will berate them with the same vitriol as he blames himself for authoring an out-of-touch, radical, job-killing carbon tax, which led to his party's humiliating defeat in the last election.
No comments:
Post a Comment