“There is a point of privacy here.”

 

Yes, in addition to being unnecessary, bullying, discriminatory, and an attempt at mislabeling EI recipients, the new spy visits home audits are an outrageous invasion of privacy.  Nice of Wallin to point that out!

Oh wait…she’s…let’s see…upset that tax payers want to know if she’s sucking up public funds from a province she says she doesn’t live in because she’s also sucking up public funds on a claim she lives in another.

Right.

Any time anyone is using or claiming public funds and there is bizarre activity or they make bizarre claims, it should be investigated.  Unless there is a security issue involved, the public has the right to know how their money is being spent, and question activities that appear fraudulent.

Wallin shows a great deal of contempt for Canadians, for laws, and for the Senate by portraying indignation at being asked for the transparency and accountability non-parliamentary Canadians are expected to provide.

Meanwhile, clients – legitimate recipients of EI are having their privacy invaded, because, you know, some people might abuse public funds.

Don’t we know it!  Right, Pamela?