Care to expand on that, harperbot? People trying to strike down the ridiculous law that says prostitution is legal, but keeping a common bawdy house or communicating for the purposes of prostitution are illegal can support their case by showing the incongruities of such a law, and the dangers this poses not only to prostitutes, but to other citizens as well.
Really. We all know you personally believe prostitution is baaaaad, because robots can't do real sex. They just don't get it, and updating your software to mechanically simulate sex could cause problems. What if the program has a virus and it infects you?
We know your program is pretty limited, coming as it does from your invisible sky monster, who- as we legions of the damned are told often enough - works in mysterious ways and we cannot presume to know it's mind.
But while you may not question your program that mindlessly fires away with baaaad, baaaad, baaad, the rest of us who make our own decisions based on observation, learning, tempered somewhat by human emotions such as compassion and empathy, and topped off by a great deal of analysis and debate do question. We like to understand why we are asked to ban some things and support others.
Weird, isn't it?
And who is this "we" you always go on about? Is it a ultimate ruler with a direct line to a god thing? We meaning you and Mr. Myth? Because we know that with you there is an "I" in team and every other word and that it's the only letter that matters. So when you say "we," I can't help but wonder. Because I don't have a bot program to feed me simplistic certainties.
No comments:
Post a Comment