Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Who is the elitist now?

Scott Reid has the breast best idea yet.

"It offers a crisp cleavage with the government that, properly communicated, can lend the Liberals and their leader some desperately needed definition."

It's often difficult for a party to find that one issue that will resonate clearly with enough Canadians not only to make a difference in an election, but to define the party as well.  Scott Reid may have identified it:

"When Stephen Harper can, Stephen Harper does behave like the most conservative prime minister in our nation's history. So fear not, all you howl-at-the-moon Milton Friedmans. His unwillingness to expand the CPP — which ranks as just about the most successful pension-income security plan in the developed world — is bold confirmation that Ayn Rand still triumphs over common sense, public interest and sound policy in Harper's Ottawa."

Reid suggests three moves the Liberals should make:

(Have Igatieff) personally lead the charge and to persuasively state the problem — preferably in plain, uncomplicated language: Working Canadians are worried their pension income will be so low they won't ever find it possible to retire. Harper suggests new private sector savings options. But one in four Canadians already can't contribute a single dollar to their RRSPs.  The better way is to build on the CPP. It includes all Canadians — not just some.

(H)it on Harper's motivations...Harper and the Conservatives prefer private pension plans sold by banks and insurance companies instead of the CPP. That's because they can afford to pay into private pension plans. Most people can't. Just like most people don't have those large taxpayer-funded pensions that Harper and his cabinet get. Initially, every province but one said yes to helping all Canadians by building on the CPP. Stephen Harper said no. Just like he said no to a law that would have made Nortel pay pensioners and those on disability a fuller portion of what the company owed them.

(T)alk about the role of government: Ottawa has an obligation to act in the public interest, to help deliver opportunity to the middle class and to defend our seniors. In times like these when most people wonder if they'll ever be able to retire we need the national government to show national leadership. Stephen Harper believes the CPP is just another issue where government should step aside. Liberals believe government has an obligation to step up.

Nice.  Turn that whole elitist theme back onto harper and take on an issue that affects most Canadians.  We are all headed toward retirement and the economic landscape is looking more precarious every year.  The first wave of baby-boomers hits 65 this year.

Oh, and keep mentioning cleavage.  Gotta win over those older men.

3 comments:

Beijing York said...

Reid's points are spot on.

This should be treated with outrage by all opposition parties and even non-elected ones (Greens). I guess we can't count on the media since they are beholden to the advertising bucks they get from the financial/insurance industry.

Political tacticians should also re-visit how Bush was defeated in trying to introduce his proposed privatization of Social Security in his first term. The only large segment of the population that supported it was well-heeled young people who felt they could make a killing through the stock market for decades, such is the confidence of youth. This was also prior to the financial meltdown.

Real_PHV_Mentarch said...

Those on the photo are definitely fake - or ludicrously "propped up".

Hmmm ... I'm sure there's an analogy for something/someone here - but what exactly, I fail to grasp ... Just a weird feeling, I guess.

Never mind, then.

;-)

900ft Jesus said...

didn't know that about the US, Bush, and social security. Those are the types of issues to run with since they directly affect so many.

M. - fake boobs...fits