Friday, March 18, 2011

Signs of poor jugment?

No, signs of a person completely devoid of any sense of ethics or social responsibility.
Most employers do background checks to weed out applicants who have committed serious crimes such as fraud.  They also do them to weed out people who fail miserably at managing their own affairs and finances.  Employers tend to view people who spend recklessly then default on loans as not particularly trustworthy.

Most employers want honest, trustworthy employees, preferably with no criminal record.  You know, people with integrity.

Mob bosses prefer people who are greedy because they can be bought and made to do things that ethical people would refuse to do.  They seek out seasoned criminals because they know that morals and ethics won’t get in the way of getting a dirty job done.  They prefer people who have no respect for the law and no care for who they hurt.

Let’s see who the current Prime Minister of Canada had as one of his top advisors for many years.  Surely a law-and-order type like steve would insist on someone who has absolute respect for the law, someone trustworthy, honest, with a clean record.  Someone who can manage his own affairs ethically and successfully.

Meet Bruce Carson:

- disbarred for forging cheques and stealing $23,900 from a corporation and two individual clients he represented.

- sentenced to 18 months in jail in 1983 for his criminal conviction of two counts of theft for misappropriating almost $20,000 of his clients’ funds by forging their signatures and stashing the money in his own bank account.

- had a habit of “living too high and overspending,” as the judge put it, so that it caught up to him between 1978 and 1980.

- defaulted on an $11,310 bank loan, a $70,000 mortgage for one property, a $3,033.01 loan on a 1978 Lincoln Continental, a $1,189.50 account he’d run up at the Hudson’s Bay Company, another $1,900 bill to a leasing firm as well as having a second house repossessed.  His punishment?  Pay a $13,000 penalty.

Despite (or maybe because of?) this history, steve felt he was just the right guy to act as his close advisor for years.

Now what kind of advice would you expect to get from such a man - a fraudster with no concern of who he harms through his greed?


That harper chose to have Carson close to him in an advisory position is not so much a sign of steve having poor judgment as it is of him being devoid of ethics and respect for our laws.

4 comments:

Christian said...

It is great to have to have you back! I made a feeble attempt at sharing that with you about a month ago after a very long night, distracted by the damn "malice bot".

Okay truth be told, I was more confused rather than distracted. I'm sure you get the gist...:)

As far as your statement/question regarding harper's integrity goes? I have sat on some links proving steve's 'terrorism guy' is as big a fraud as he is.

I just have not had the time to put it all together. But make no mistake, steve seeks assholes like him who he can later point to and explain how it shows Canadians don't want an election....or something...

On a side note, if you have the time and are interested in harper's terrorism guy, I'd be more than happy to send you the links. They define harper's pattern of searching for 'experts' who are willing to back his ideology.

I know you'd do a great job with what I think, was one of the most unreported stories from our media. Let me know....

900ft Jesus said...

I'd love to have that link, Christian, thanks! Almost makes me a believer the way something seems to come to harper's rescue when he's down in the polls. I knew he'd try and cash in on Japan, then Lybia. Oh yeah!!! flex them muscles! Exude that testosterone! Let's go kill us some muslims!!! Bring out the jets! all for a harper win, of course.

Here we go again...

900ft Jesus said...

and thanks very much for the feedback, Christian.

Christian said...

Sorry for the long delay in getting back to you. Work, work, effin, work. And other stuff :)

When I looked up the links in my "bookmarks", they were gone. But a google has lead me back to a member of prog~blog who was also on the case, unbeknownst to me until now. I actually had the links backing this blogger's claims, and wish I could be more helpful, however, if you do find the story relevant, proving yet again stephen harper is a dirtbag who governs only by ideology, a quick copy and paste of from Sudbury Against War and Occupation's piece should suffice.

I have faith in your google foo capabilities. Here is the link, and though the whole post is a worthwhile read, the sixth paragraph introduces harper's choice as "terrorism expert", Rohan Gunaratna, and why he and harper should not be trusted with a weather forecast.